Judge Requires New Evidence in Stadium Suit

Related Articles »





  • Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
  • Comments Comments (0)

The parties in a lawsuit objecting to proposed development near Memorial Stadium will have to submit further expert evidence to support their arguments, a judge ruled Wednesday afternoon.

This ruling comes after the Panoramic Hill Association and California Oak Foundation, two of the three plaintiffs in the case, asked the judge to reconsider her request for more evidence.

A final ruling in the case is now expected by mid-March, more than a year after three groups-including the city of Berkeley-filed lawsuits against the University of California over a proposed athletic center near the stadium.

In a partial ruling on Dec. 10, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Barbara Miller found that the center may be subject to the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 banning construction near active earthquake faults.

To help determine if the proposed athletic center is a separate structure from the stadium, Miller requested that the plaintiffs and defendants submit expert architectural evidence.

But two plaintiffs asked the judge to reconsider, saying the case should only be based on the documents that were presented to the UC Board of Regents when they approved the plan in December 2006.

However, in her order yesterday, Miller said the plaintiffs in the case did not supply enough evidence for her to reconsider her original request.

"Petitioners have not presented any new or different facts, circumstances or law that would justify reconsideration," the order states.

Michael Lozeau, an attorney for the Panoramic Hill Association, said he was prepared for the case to go forward.

"We're going to do our best to get some solid expert evidence to the judge," he said.

Mike Kelly, a board member of the association, said earlier this week that his group has already made contact with an architect to develop the evidence, but would not specify who.

Dan Mogulof, the campus' executive director of public affairs, said it was likely the campus' evidence would include a variety of sources, but Ed Denton, the vice chancellor for facilities services, would be a chief contributor.

The parties will have until Feb. 22 to gather and submit the expert evidence. There will be a hearing on the new material March 7.

Tags: MEMORIAL STADIUM LAWSUITS, CITY GOVERNMENT, TREE PROTEST


Will Kane is the assistant city news editor. Contact him at [email protected]



Comments (0) »

Comment Policy
The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.
White space
Left Arrow
City Council
Image Local Legend a Lifelong Social Advocate
Bundled up in a fleece snowman blanket with "The Oprah Winfrey Show" on the...Read More»
City Council
Image People's Park, Telegraph Avenue Key Issues in Dist...
With less than a week until this year's Berkeley Ci...Read More»
City Council
Image District 7 Candidates Talk Campaign Funding
As the three-way race for the Berkeley City Council District 7 seat spee...Read More»
City Council
Image Candidates Vie for City Council Seats
With two weeks left in the nomination period for the Berkeley City Council ...Read More»
Right Arrow




Job Postings

White Space